ABOUT US

AFRICAN OIL BLOG

INDUSTRY/TECHNOLOGY

CONTACT US

  STATISTICS

HOME

A.O.J  AD. RATES AND INFO.

Who's Who in Oil

CONFERENCES AND EVENTS CALENDAR

ANGOLA      ALGERIA      CAMEROON      CHAD.      CONGO      EGYPT..      EQUATORIAL GUINEA      GABON      LIBYA.     NIGERIA      SOUTH AFRICA      SUDAN      TUNISIA      OTHERS 

Managed Pressure Drilling

João Carlos Ribeiro Plácido, Antônio Carlos Vieira Martins Lage, Emmanuel Franco Nogueira, Guilherme Siqueira Vanni and Manoel Feliciano da Silva Jr

Petrobras is always looking for new technologies. Since most oil fields are located in deep and ultra-deep water, exploration costs are very high. Therefore, drilling and completion of wells in these conditions must always use the best possible technologies.

In order to make new technologies available, Petrobras first checks whether they are already available on the market. If not, Petrobras normally tries to develop them in partnership with other operators, service companies, independent research centres or universities. Several technologies have been developed using this model.

Here, we are going to describe two technologies that have been developed by Petrobras in partnership with other companies – managed pressure drilling (MPD) and intelligent wells.

Managed Pressure Drilling

According to the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), MPD is an adaptive drilling process that is used to control the annular pressure profile more precisely throughout the wellbore. Its objectives are to ascertain the limits of the downhole pressure environment and to manage the annular hydraulic pressure profile accordingly. The benefits of MPD are as follows:

The main objective is to provide the ability to drill a well with accurate control of the bottomhole pressure (BHP), in order that the operation be conducted with more flexibility and in a proactive way; this is in contrast with the passive mode used in conventional drilling. MPD can be described as the sum of mud weight, equivalent circulation density and casing back pressure. With this in mind, it is easy to see that any one of these components can be modified in order to reach the drilling pressure required for the duration of the drilling process.



Several concepts have already been developed and are now being brought to market. Some of these focus on controlling the equivalent circulating density (ECD), while others focus on the casing back pressure (CBP). The aim is to maintain a constant BHP. However, merely having the ability to control the BHP brings very few benefits if the optimum value to be used is not known. Many of the techniques and alternatives developed in the past were difficult to accept due to their complexity, the number of modifications required to traditional ways of thinking and drilling and the need for substantial investment in equipment and training. In many cases, the application of these technologies was restricted to a defined area and problem, increasing the risks involved in making significant investments.

In order to benefit from the concept of MPD, in early 2006 Petrobras signed a Technical Co-operation Agreement with Impact Group in order to perform a four-well evaluation of secure drilling technology.

Secure Drilling™

Secure drilling™ is a closed-loop MPD system based on the microflux control (MFC) method, a new MPD technology designed to improve drilling in most conditions – from simple wells to highpressure, narrow-margin, offshore and other challenging wells – and to increase safety through automated kick detection and control. It uses a closed-loop drilling process that allows for the realtime identification of micro-influxes and losses and the control and management of downhole pressures through automated data acquisition and computerised pressure control. The system is capable of detecting influxes and losses very early and controlling an influx automatically, keeping the total volume of the influx in the well to less than five barrels (bbl). In addition, the system can identify many other common drilling problems, including:

Although the primary objective of Petrobras is to use secure drilling in deep and ultra-deepwater operations, the four-well evaluation programme began with a simple land well before progressing to more complex scenarios. The first well selected for the programme was a shallow exploratory well. A kelly-equipped Petrobras rig without any automation was chosen with the aim of confirming the system’s capability to be used on virtually any rig. The first well was drilled in August 2006 in the northeast of Brazil using a water-based drilling fluid. A total of 1,824ft (556m) of the 81⁄2-inch section was drilled in five days without the system presenting any problems. The results at this first well confirmed the system’s ability to operate in the field under very warm conditions, identify changes in flow on a realtime basis and be installed on most rigs with a minimal number of modifications.



The response from the rig crew was outstanding. They quickly realised the benefits the system would bring to their daily operation, and the simplicity of the system, its small footprint and the fact that all operational procedures are the same as in conventional drilling meant that the rig crew accepted the system extremely well.

A second well was drilled in November 2006, again in the northeast of Brazil but this time from a top drive-equipped rig. A total of 6,621ft (2,018m) of the 121⁄4-inch phase and 1,161ft (354m) of the 81⁄2-inch phase was drilled. The total drilling time was 43 days. During the final phase of drilling the system detected a 1bbl kick while tripping, allowing for a rapid and safe response by increasing mud weight. In addition, a micro-leakage at the wellhead was detected by the system, enabling repair before any major problem ensued.

In the forthcoming months, Petrobras will drill another two wells using the secure drilling method – one in an onshore tight-gas scenario and the other in a high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) well from a jack-up rig.

Intelligent Wells

A well is called intelligent only if it adds value to the project during its life-cycle. Monitoring of production parameter elements and/or flow control devices are used to determine this.

Subsurface monitoring gained popularity in the early 1990s due to an increase in reliability and the improvement of metrological parameters. This has accelerated the development of optical technology, which has been made more robust in order to survive hostile environments such as downhole conditions. Petrobras is investing in the development of optical sensors as well as downhole flow control for moderated service conditions. These areas have seen significant results, e.g. the Carmopolis intelligent field project (see below). At present, this is the main application of intelligent wells in Petrobras, resulting in a more efficient use of human and material resources.

The definition of ‘intelligent completion’, according to the White Paper on Digital Oil Fields of the Future (DOFF) by Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), is completion using downhole sensors and remotely actuated flow control devices, allowing access to realtime information and supporting fast decisions.

The use of permanent downhole monitoring systems in oil and gas wells began in the late 1960s, but it was only in the early 1990s – when reliability reached acceptable levels and metrological parameters were improved – that it was widely adopted by operators. The use of quartz sensors and improvements to the robustness of electronic sensors were responsible for this evolution. In the late 1990s, optical fibre sensors began to be used, with a focus on improving reliability and ensuring the simplicity of technological updates. These sensors have played an important role in the high-flow gas wells of HPHT wells.

Among the sensors available on the market, the distributed temperature sensor (DTS) and the pressure and temperature (P&T) sensor are the most common. Sensors play a major role in intelligent wells as they provide the operator with a realtime perception of the production process.

Intelligent completion packers are used to provide hydraulic isolation of each zone, allowing selective control of the intervals; the uppermost completion packer is also responsible for anchoring the tubing and providing the first safety barrier for the annulus – the same basic functions of a regular production packer. Furthermore, there are packers for isolation purposes only; as these include only the isolating material with no anchoring material the force needed to unset them is reduced, allowing a large number of isolation intervals. The intelligent completion packers also include passages for the control and monitoring lines, known as ‘penetrations’; typically, an intelligent completion packer presents four to nine penetrations. During setting procedures, the intelligent completion packer must not allow its components to move to avoid transmitting any tension to the control or monitoring lines.

The flow control valves are responsible for allowing selective control of production or injection. They can be actuated hydraulically or electrically, or by a combination of both (multiplexed). Hydraulic actuation is the most common type; here, a balanced piston is used to shift a sliding sleeve that restricts the passage through the valve. Usually, one opening control line is used for each valve with a common closing control line for the system to reduce the number of hydraulic lines installed. In electrically actuated valves, an electrical motor is responsible for the shifting of the sleeve. The motors are actuated using a single electrical line for all motors that also supplies the addressing information, which is decoded in the valve. This makes this kind of valve appropriate for wells where there are restrictions on the number of penetrations on the wellhead or on the tubing hanger.

The valves can also be classified according to the flow control they provide – on-off, multi-position and infinitely variable. On-off valves provide selectivity simply by allowing or not allowing the flow. Multi-position valves provide several steps of choking and are designed according to the flow rate expected in the well. They can use an index system to restrict the course and supply choking or an external device that provides a very controlled volume of hydraulic fluid in each shifting. Infinitely variable valves are more complex, as they require sensors to give feedback on their position in order to adjust the choking. There are also several geometries for the valve orifices – the most common are circular and elliptical slots, which are used in on-off/multiposition and infinitely variable valves respectively. The main parameters for specifying intelligent completion valves are flow range, maximum pressure and maximum differential pressure.

When using hydraulically actuated valves, an hydraulical power unit (HPU) is needed. Basically, an HPU comprises a pump, which can be pneumatic or electrically actuated, and a manifold, which is manipulated according to a logic determined by the maker of the system. This logic can be placed in a programmable logic controller (PLC) that actuates solenoid valves on the manifold, making the entire procedure transparent to the operator, as well as providing the ability to operate the HPU remotely. To confirm shifting, intelligent completion HPUs usually have a small tank that verifies the volume of fluid returned after the pressures supplied to the valves have stabilised. Some HPUs also measure the flow rate of the returned fluid, but this process is much more complicated and significantly increases the cost without providing many benefits.



The cables used for monitoring and control have to be protected against chemically hostile environments, such as downhole conditions and mechanical shocks during intervention procedures. Generally, the conductor medium (electrical or optical) is encapsulated in a 1⁄4-inch metallic tubing – which offers mechanical resistance – and coated with a polymeric material – which protects against chemical attacks. Cable protectors (clamps) are used to hold the cable to the production tubing and to offer extra protection near the couplings, where the diameter of the tubing is increased. Dry-mate connectors are used to connect the cable to sensors or to another cable. Devices called ‘feed-throughs’ are used to pass the signal through the tubing hanger and wellhead and ensure that there is no pressure communication. In subsea trees or downhole, wet-mate connectors are used in seawater environments or in the presence of production fluids.

A range of electrical connectors – both dry- and wet-mate – and feed-throughs are already certified and used by Petrobras; optical dry-mate connectors and feed-throughs are currently passing through the certification process; while optical wet-mate connectors that match Petrobras specifications are still at the development stage.

The data gathered by the sensors need to be presented to the operators in realtime, which can be achieved using a supervisory. It is also very important that the connectivity of all equipment allows the integration of all data. The use of open standards and protocols reduces connectivity and integration issues.

Intelligent completion can be used together with other completion techniques such as sand control and artificial lift, but in these cases an interface project is crucial to ensure the reliability of the system. Specific completion tools or projects are used to integrate artificial lift systems with intelligent completion, allowing the intervention of the upper tubing – which contains the lift system – to be independent from the lower tubing – which contains the intelligent completion tools. These tools include a wet disconnect tool (WDT), which is the most practical solution for completions using electrical submersible pumps (ESPs). Electric-hydraulic and optical-hydraulic WDT tools are currently being developed by Petrobras in conjunction with service companies.

Value Chain

Several aspects regarding the use of intelligent wells need to be analysed. Permanent monitoring allows reservoir management to be optimised. The selectivity achieved by flow control allows formation and interference tests to be carried out more simply, and more precise data to be obtained with a view to updating reservoir models. The data obtained can also be used to minimise water production, reducing the need to process for re-injection and disposal and thus reducing the size of the plant. Distributed temperature monitoring can be used to optimise and evaluate steam injection and gas lift. Monitoring the pressure and temperature of the pump inflow allows automatic adjustment of pumping parameters. Surface or subsurface data can be used for early prediction of faults in processes and equipment through pattern recognition techniques such as neural networks and data mining. Realtime monitoring allows precise fault diagnostics, allowing better use of human and material resources.

As with any tool, an economic and value-added evaluation must be used to estimate all of the benefits. The operational impact of the equipment must also be evaluated due to its quantity and complexity. There are several endeavours both inside and outside Petrobras working to create analysis tools that support intelligent well projects, which will help operators to choose the most appropriate solution.

Applications in
Petrobras Land Mature Fields

Petrobras chose the Carmopolis field, a land mature field, as its first intelligent field pilot project. As seen in Figure 3, the project encompassed seven wells equipped with intelligent completion, using different suppliers. The intention was to identify the suppliers that had solutions for moderated service conditions such as those found in Carmopolis.

An integrated intelligent well system was developed for the project. In this system, artificial lift automation was completely integrated with the intelligent completion system in order to satisfy the availability and reliability demands of the operators and to ensure that the benefits of the reservoir and production optimisation were effective.

The well completion consisted of three hydraulic packers, three flow control valves and four pressure and temperature optical fibre sensors. The equipment was developed to be low cost with moderate service condition specifications. The artificial lift method used in the project was a rod pump and the regular practices were to locate the pump below perforation and to use fixed pumps. A completely new automation system was used to integrate all systems using open standards and remote diagnostics ability.

Although the conventional well completion used in the Carmopolis field was very simple and had a low intervention cost, the large number of wells (more than 1,000) elevated the maintenance cost of the field. Also, being a land mature field, a large number of interventions were needed – mostly to change artificial lift equipment and to increase productivity – requiring a large number of rigs to maintain the field. The operation had a very limited budget due to its low productivity and a very limited number of rigs available to make the interventions.

The initial results from the Carmopolis project showed improved reliability, diagnostics and capital expenditure (CAPEX) when compared with similar implementations in Petrobras. The expectation from this point forwards is that operational expenditure (OPEX) will also be improved.

Conclusion

Drilling and completion operations in deep and ultra-deepwater require new technologies in order for final cost to be reduced. Petrobras faces this problem every day because its daily rig rates are expensive. When these technologies are not already available in the market, the only way to proceed is to develop them. The model Petrobras has used to develop most of these well technologies has been through partnership with other companies, universities and research centres. MPD and intelligent wells are two examples of new technologies that have been developed in partnership with the objective of improving the performance of wells.