ABOUT US

AFRICAN OIL BLOG

INDUSTRY/TECHNOLOGY

CONTACT US

  STATISTICS

HOME

A.O.J  AD. RATES AND INFO.

Who's Who in Oil

CONFERENCES AND EVENTS CALENDAR

ANGOLA      ALGERIA      CAMEROON      CHAD.      CONGO      EGYPT..      EQUATORIAL GUINEA      GABON      LIBYA.     NIGERIA      SOUTH AFRICA      SUDAN      TUNISIA      OTHERS 

Data Validation and Reconciliation  for Upstream Applications

Professor Boris Kalitventzeff
European Computer Aided Process Engineering (CAPE) working party. Founder and Chairman of Belsim s.a.

 

 

When the author visited part of the subsea oil exploration and production (E&P) system of Mexican Petroleum (PEMEX) in the Gulf of Mexico he did not imagine that computer aided process engineering (CAPE) technologies could benefit from such upstream process systems.

Indeed, it is questionable as to whether the personnel operating in heavy conditions should need to consider mathematical models and optimisation methods. If the crude oil flow rate of a well is sufficiently depleted, the personnel will bore another well. Several questions arose regarding why well production is weakening, whether it could be sustained to a higher quality level and where to drill another well, although this was more than 15 years ago from the time of press. Computer-assisted oil and gas production is not a futuristic vision anymore; however, it can benefit greatly from a mature technology that is successfully applied in the downstream business – the data validation and reconciliation (DVR) technology.

The objective of this article is to draw upstream experts and decision makers into that technology, describe it briefly, analyse obstacles and incentives to its implementation in oil and gas production and report about the benefits obtained from a first demonstration implementation in a subsea production field in West Africa.

The Technology

The data validation and reconciliation technology consists of a method and its corresponding software tool. Its purpose is to:

detect and correct deviations and errors of measurement data so that these satisfy all balance constraints;

exploit the structure and the knowledge of the process system together with the measurement data to compute unmeasured data wherever it is possible, in particular the key performance indicators (KPI); and

determine the post-processing accuracy of measured and unmeasured data including KPIs.

The method enhances the quality of the information data, which in turn enables sufficient monitoring decisions and knowledge-based actions.

Figure 1* displays recorded raw data and the corresponding validated data. It illustrates one of the assets of the DVR technology, allowing valuable information to be unearthed that would otherwise be hidden in the ‘noise’ of raw measurement data. In this situation for instance, it is only after DVR that a functional relationship between the two displayed variables can be obtained.


Figure 1: Data Reconciliation Unearths Hidden Information

From such simple facts a control expert will understand the complementarities of DVR systems and advanced process control (APC) systems.

Mathematically speaking, the method states and solves a non-linear programming problem. In upto- date DVR software tools the constraints equations (mass and energy balances and thermodynamic equilibrium constraints) are automatically generated when modelling the process at hand using a graphical user interface. The method implements statistical and thermodynamic principles so that it differs from simulation methods. DVR determines the performance parameters of the process system based on measurement redundancy. It therefore does not compete with simulation methods that can benefit from the said consistency data processing.

In a recent preliminary study the potential synergy between DVR and data mining (DM) was analysed.

Figure 2: Soft Sensor Reproducing Validated KPI

Figure 2 is based on approximately 4,000 DVR results on an oil refinery plant. The purple curve displays a validated KPI as a function of time and the green curve presents the corresponding KPI values as predicted by a DM soft sensor during and after the learning period. Such an illustration demonstrates that DVR brings new assets for DM systems.

The DVR tool can be used singly but can also be used in synergy with other tools, as shown in this example. Another important asset in upstream applications is when the measuring equipment is very expensive – it has been experienced in downstream applications that the tool can determine a number of unmeasured data two to three times bigger than the number of measured data. It can therefore be regarded as producing a valuable virtual measurement set.

The Production System

An oilfield is an industrial process system with its inputs and outputs. It is composed of subsystems – the field itself or reservoir that is likely to remain a fuzzy subset, the incoming streams network with its water, gas and (in deep-sea) methanol injection systems, the outgoing streams network including production wells, pipes, manifolds, riser and topside installations for energy delivery and crude oil separation and pre-treatment. The oilfield itself may be subdivided into several production areas. The incoming and outgoing stream networks can cover several field areas (possibly exploited by different oil companies or owners).

Appropriate DVR software tools can be potentially applied to deal with such process systems due to their modular structure. At present it is only partly the case as reported hereafter. To prepare such integrated applications, the challenges will be analysed and the expected obstacles and incentives identified.

The Challenge

What matters is to expand the ‘smart wells’ concept to the ‘smart field’ concept. Each subsystem is to be deeply analysed and modelled for itself – all the subsystems then have to be integrated together to obtain a process representation synthesis.

The challenge is to manage the inflow system, setting the individual water and gas (and methanol) injection flow rates and to manage the outflow system, opening or closing wells or zones to increase integrated oil production and oil recovery during the life-cycle of the exploited field.

The core subsystem is the reservoir itself – it can be treated as a ‘black box’, with arrays of input data and arrays of output data. It has been previously shown that all those data can be validated providing quality information data. Any mathematical model (simple or complex; static or dynamic) represents a functional relationship between individual outputs in response to individual inputs.

Appropriate models result from a compromise – the more complex the model the more numerous its parameters and to determine more numerous parameters there is a need for more high quality information data. In an environment of costly measuring devices, limitations on model complexity can arise.

Smart operations along the field subsystems are the key to steady increment production performance; however, there is a question over whether it should be recognised that smart operations rely on the concept of quality and whether proper actions can be decided on a system where there is a lack of knowledge, or a partially fuzzy understanding of the system due to a lack of consistency of the raw information data. The technology exists to unearth reliable and more precise data interpretation. Such technology can help production managers to use their own skills more proficiently.

Many questions can potentially be answered applying the DVR technology to exploit available measurement data. These questions concern:

the flow rates of water and gas in the inflow system possibly in each injection well;

methanol quantity to avoid hydrates drawback;

the sensitivity of the outlet stream of a production well to water inflow in that area;

water leakage; and

indications of water breakthrough.

Implementation in Upstream Operations

DVR is a proven technology in downstream applications. Payback times have been reported as ‘always less than one year’; however, the question of whether it will be readily implemented in the upstream area now arises.

Several obstacles other than suspicion or reasons of unawareness have been identified. Obstacles encountered and in the downstream include:

there is already a range of software technology deployed;

how DVR complements existing simulation tools; and DVR tool comparison with competitors.

A second series of obstacles originates from general trends in research and development (R&D) financing:

the development effort size needed to adapt or to more competantly dedicate software tools to field systems;

whether this kind of innovative technology is part of the objectives that need to be focused on and whether this answers the specified needs;

whether the technology can be integrated in current IT systems and whether turnkey implementations, including modelling, can be offered; and it is important to know whether the technology has already been applied as companies often do not want to be the first to try the technology. There is also a question over the costs incurred if it fails to meet expectations.

DVR implementation incentives:

Much is written about R&D financing decreases; however, innovation is still recognised as a must.

The technology has been proven to be highly beneficial in the chemical industry and in the downstream.

The technology has successfully been applied in offshore facilities in West Africa – it is at field trial stage.

There is a tendency in several upstream majors to address selected R&D topics to services companies.

There is a tendency to encourage collaborations between production companies – this may be indicated when the exploitation of big oilfields is shared.

There is a tendency to outsource noncore functions.

If an application partly fails, there is no risk of heavy consequences because the technology is an add-in; it operates as a watchdog.

Lastly, the technology can be used for the design or for retrofit of measuring instrumentation.

Benefits

Generally speaking, up-to-date DVR technology:

provides the most accurate and reliable values for all sensors;

enables validation of the data by using subsea redundancy and topside measurements when available;

provides calibration of flow meters (choke, pressure and temperature (P&T) models) using other flow meters;

provides an alarm when the difference between measured and validated values of any measurement exceeds a given threshold;

provides a back-up for multiphase flow meters and other sensors, in case of sensor failure;

determines the flow through the entire network (wells, flow lines and risers, etc.);

provides estimated values for any unmeasured value. For instance, it provides validated values for unmeasured flow rates, acting as a virtual flow meter. In addition, the accuracy of the virtual sensor is determined; and

helps the diagnosis by detecting and quantifying water or gas breakthrough.

A Practical Demonstration Application

DVR technology was successfully implemented in an upstream offshore production facility on the West African coast. It validates the performance of the water injection system online every day. An application provider has developed the model and commissioned the system on site. The validation system has been integrated with the production historian database (Oracle) to extract the measured data and is essentially used through an Excel interface. Production engineers use the system daily to:

produce accurate and coherent production balances;

detect and quantify bypasses;

detect and quantify water leaks;

detect drifting and erroneous sensors and correct them when necessary; and

compare actual water injection rates to set points and take corrective actions.

The system has also been used to locate where additional counters should be placed to further improve the balance quality.

The overall project leads to numerous identified benefits:

increased accuracy of data;

detection of leaks of approximately 2,000 tons/day of injection water. Correcting the problem enabled the operator to bring production back to its nominal level;

improved follow-up of each well (without validation the cause of a decrease of 1,000 barrels per day (bbl/day) compared with a total production of more than 100,000 bbl/day would have been hard to identify);

optimisation of water injection for an improved distribution among the wells;

diagnosis on equipment performance;

setting priorities for instrumentation maintenance;

enhancement of the measurement system by focused maintenance of the instrumentation;

assistance on the locations for new sensors; and

simplified daily work of the reporting crew.


Conclusion

Data validation and reconciliation technology is a mature technology. It can create value by providing enhanced data and upset detection, resulting in increased production and better management of the production systems.

Its implementation in upstream business is currently being examined by several major players in the area.

Professor Boris Kalitventzeff has been Chairman of the European Computer Aided Process Engineering (CAPE) working party for six years. He the founder and Chairman of Belsim s.a., a European software and engineering services company. Belsim s.a. is an 18 year old spinoff of the research and development (R&D) team he created as a professor at the University of Liege, Belgium, in the 1970s. That R&D team specialised in data validation and reconciliation technology and in process energy integration technology.